Wednesday, 15 July 2015

Setting institutional frame work with rural housing by Olusegun Ariyo.

                                                                                           
Government intervention in housing delivery predates Nigeria’s independence. The colonial administration provided limited staff quarters for the colonial masters and reasonable chunk of the class dwellings. However, successive post independence government, military and civilian, have adopted national development plan as potent instrument for economic development, covering all vital sectors of the national economy.



 Unfortunately, virtually all the plan buried housing in obscurity, lumping it among other services in the social services sub-sectors. Rural housing is an exhibition of decadence, criminal neglect, and quantitative inadequacies of indices of comfortable living, of social and infrastructural facilities and services. Housing in a typical rural setting, particularly in developing counties, illustrates deprivation.  The rural areas parades housing environment devoid of basic amenities provided to meet the psychological and physiological needs of human living. In Nigeria, the rural housing sub-sector has suffered untold neglect from the hands of successful government. The colonial masters did not prepare a housing programme for the teaming Nigerian populace.



 The establishment of Lagos executive development board was informed by circumstances outside the realm of concern for the housing plight of citizens saddled with the primary assignment of effective planning and developing Lagos, the Lagos executive development board was established in 1928 following the bubonic  plague  in the  1920s. However, by 1954, after the approval of Lagos central planning schemes, the board began to solve the problem of public housing in Lagos. This resulted in such schemes as surulere workers housing estate and Eric Moore housing estates.



The establishment of the African staff housing scheme for the main purpose of encouraging civil servants to own their house was a belated realization of the enormity of the housing problem. With this scheme, the systematic development of estate in surulere, apapa and other areas saw the continued demand for house ownership by civil servant. This was the beginning of elitist housing programmes. It was the era when government reservation area was built to house the colonialist and the compromised of highly placed Nigerians.



 Other categories of lagosians and Nigerian in the hinterland suffered untold neglect. Between 1960 when Nigeria obtained independence and 1971, there was virtually no housing’’ in the scheme of national planning. It was in 1972 that a housing programme was established during the 2nd development plan period. and the Thrust of the programme was the plan to build 59,000 dwelling units 15,000 in Lagos, 4,000 in each of the eleven state in then  12 state structured Nigeria till date. In all this, there was not even a vague reference to rural housing. In 1973 the federal housing authority was created to co-ordinate a nation wide housing programme at the federal level. The 4th national development plan of 1975 had the plan for the construction of 202,000 dwellings at then, a whooping cost of #2.6billion.




This was immediately followed by the creation of a ministry of housing, urban development and environment. In particular, the ministry was to initiate and co-ordinate policies in housing related matter and areas. Between 1979 and 1983, the NPN controlled federal government gave high priority  to housing targeting the low and medium income groups 40,000 were meant to be constructed annually, nationwide. In 1983, only about 30% achievement was recorded. It was pathetic to note that most sites and location of these housing estates were either at city centers or their immediate peripheral precincts.  This indeed, has shown that all the action taken by government and their agencies, rural housing was neglected however, virtually all national housing policies, since 1991 seemed to address the housing plight of rural dwellers. But again, the tidy and laudable paper works have been denied executive implementation toward the realization of decent and affordable rural housing. however, the rural housing situation paint a disturbing picture aside of the glaring qualitative shortcomings, the Nigeria rural housing qualitative inadequacies can be said to  be the intricacies of  locally soured  building materials, leading to crude construction technique.




 Lack of infrastructural facilities, absence of modern toilets facilities, the bushy surrounding land provide succor in this respect. Building is preponderantly of traditional courtyards designs, mainly of swish mud with thatched roof, bamboo splint for ceiling and employs anthropometric methods in determining dimension of rooms, corridors, headroom. At this expense, the government over time was only in recognition of rural economy as a nerve center of the nation, this it did by sponsoring some programmes like integrated rural development in 1970, river basin authorities in 1976, better life for rural women in 1985 and directorate of food, road rural infrastructure in 1986 respectively. These meaningful options were unfortunately encapsulating rural enterprises with infrastructure with no specific attention on upgrading the quality-deficiency rural housing stock and environment. Yet, report indicates that the entire citizenry depend on rural out put for survival.





The non-implementation of strategies spelt out in all national housing policies and programmes of 1991, 1994, 2004 and 2006 underscore the degree of neglect. Expectedly, government at all levels; need to come to the rescue of rural housing by coming up with a workable rural housing policy an independent policy not in any way made an apron-string of a national housing policy which is biased in favor of other housing sub-sector. It is a policy that must attract as much attention, political will, commitment and resources allocation as its affect other counterpart, even though there is much a do with meeting the need of its teaming populaces.

No comments:

Post a Comment